ISIS Executes 33 in Syria, Its Largest Killing of 2017
The Islamic State militant group (ISIS) executed 33 people in eastern Syria on Wednesday, according to a monitoring group, in its biggest mass killing in 2017.
In a morning execution in the eastern Syrian countryside, the group killed dozens between the ages of 18 and 25 years old, reported the U.K.-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), which has an extensive network of sources on the ground in Syria.
The execution, which SOHR said was the “largest…mass execution” carried out by ISIS this year, took place in a desert area of al-Mayadin around 8 kilometers southeast of Deir Ezzor city, still controlled by ISIS.
SOHR said that its activists were “able to monitor the execution” and “see the bodies.” The jihadi group carried out the execution with “sharp tools,” before burying its victims in a hole that the group had already created in the ground.
ISIS continues to produce gruesome propaganda videos showing the beheadings of alleged spies, enemy forces and prisoners it has captured. It is a form of punishment intended to spread fear among the civilian populations under its control.
The extremist group retains control of much of Deir Ezzor province, and Raqqa city, its de facto capital, in the neighboring province of the same name. Raqqa remains under siege from a Kurdish and Arab coalition, known as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and backed by the U.S.-led coalition, in eastern Syria.
The SDF forces are attempting to isolate ISIS in Raqqa, encircling it on all sides, and the campaign has accelerated as Iraqi forces make progress in the U.S.-backed assault on Mosul in northern Iraq.
Last month, U.S. apache helicopters dropped special forces behind ISIS lines in a bid to capture the Tabqa dam, almost 16 miles west of Raqqa. The operation to retake the major infrastructure point is continuing.
ISIS has lost much of its territory since overrunning large swathes of eastern Syria and northern and western Iraq from January 2014 onward. It has also lost significant finance and propaganda personnel in targeted coalition airstrikes.
The coalition and Iraqi ground troops, last month slowed by reports of mounting civilian casualties, are edging closer to Mosul’s Great Mosque, where ISIS leader and the world’s most-wanted terrorist, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared the creation of the group’s self-styled caliphate in July 2014.
In January the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) executed 12 people, including teachers, in the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra.
The U.K.-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) reported Thursday that ISIS beheaded four people, who were teachers and government workers, as well as four opposition fighters and four pro-government fighters. ISIS fighters reportedly shot them dead before beheading them.
The monitor said the killings took place around the city, some in the 2nd century Roman amphitheater, others in the Palmyra museum’s courtyard.
Maamoun Abdulkarim, the Syrian director of antiquities, was not immediately available for comment.
The group killed at least 25 government fighters in the ancient theater last year. In August 2015, the group executed Khaled al-Asaad, an 81-year-old archaeologist who had looked after the UNESCO heritage site’s ruins for decades.
The group had originally seized the ancient city in May 2015 from the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad but the Syrian army recaptured the city in March 2016 with the support of the Russian air force.
Russia had celebrated the liberation of the city with a performance in the city’s amphitheater by the famous conductor, and ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Valery Gergiev.
ISIS then recaptured the city from Syrian regime forces in December despite Russian bombardments on the group’s positions around the territory.
The recapture raised questions about the Syrian military’s ability to hold on to the territory that it has clawed back from ISIS, with the help of Iranian ground forces and Russian airpower.
In Canada, Where Muslims Are Few, Group Stirs Fear of Islamists.
Patrick Beaudry, bejeweled, tattooed and bearded, lives on a remote wooded hillside in rural Quebec, worrying about living under Shariah law.
A year and a half ago, he huddled with two friends in a Quebec maple sugar shack, discussing how to stop the spread of what they call “invasive political Islam” in Canada. They formed a group called La Meute, or Wolfpack, created a Facebook page and invited like-minded people to join.
Within a month, they had 15,000 followers. Today, the number has surpassed 50,000, and the group is still attracting people. Now, Mr. Beaudry and his colleagues say they are shaping those followers into dues-paying members who will give the group financial muscle and, they hope, political clout.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has publicly opened Canada’s doors to refugees and presented a face of tolerance and inclusion in a world increasingly hostile to migration. But as Canadian immigration policy has transformed the nation over decades, pockets of intolerance have grown across the country.
Nowhere has it galvanized such large numbers as in Quebec, where many people still refer to themselves as pure laine, or pure wool, direct descendants of the 17th-century settlers of New France. The most emotional response has focused on conservative Muslim immigrants, who perhaps present the greatest contrast to traditional European-based culture and the secularism that Quebec struggled hard to win from the Roman Catholic Church.
The concerns are outsize by any measure. Muslims represent just 3 percent of Canada’s population, and while Islam is one of the fastest-growing religions in the country, Muslims will still account for less than 6 percent of the population in 2050, according to the Pew Research Center.
Nonetheless, Mr. Beaudry and his peers say they believe there is a real threat that Islamists are bending Canada’s tolerant culture to their will. The group’s main concern is political Islam pushed by the Muslim Brotherhood, the Pan-Arab movement that grew out of Egypt after the fall of the Ottoman Empire following World War I.
“Political Islam is slowly invading our institutions,” Mr. Beaudry declared, claiming that his group had documentary proof, though he was not prepared to show it. “We have to wake up people and shake them up, and then we will be able to bring change.”
The theme is popular among right-wing groups across North America and Europe, where the slow integration of conservative Muslim immigrants into Judeo-Christian cultures has excited fears among some of a global culture war.
A 2004 move to set up Shariah mediation for Muslim family disputes in Ontario, which already allowed Jewish and Catholic faith-based tribunals to operate in the province, incited a national outcry.
Quebec subsequently passed a law banning Shariah tribunals. Ontario eventually banned faith-based tribunals for all religions. Nonetheless, the events left an impression among many people that conservative Muslims were working to instill Shariah law in Canada.
Canadian Muslims say that not only are such fears unfounded, but that propagating them is also dangerous, to Muslims and to society as a whole.
“They are creating a problem where there is no problem,” said Hassan Guillet, a lawyer and imam.
Mr. Guillet said Canadian Muslims were caught between what he called a relentless and often-negative media focus on Islam and right-wing groups like La Meute that spread misinformation.
“If you keep rejecting the young, they will feel frustrated and feel that they don’t belong, and they will look for their own society,” Mr. Guillet warned, adding that such disenfranchisement had led some young European Muslims down the path of radicalization. “We don’t want that. We want our kids to feel that they belong, we want our kids to feel Canadian.”
As for the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Canada, Samer Majzoub, president of the Canadian Muslim Forum and a frequent target of conspiracy theories, called it simple fearmongering.
He noted that the largest recent terrorist attack in Canada did not come from Muslims, but targeted them. He was referring to the January killing of six worshipers at a mosque in Quebec by a gunman; the man accused of the killings espoused far-right views.
Small, violent right-wing groups have appeared in the decades since Canada relaxed its immigration laws to embrace multiculturalism. But revulsion toward violence and hate speech has kept such groups on the margins. La Meute has created a more moderate setting where people can communicate their fears.
“La Meute is very different from what we have seen so far,” said Samuel Tanner, an associate professor at the International Center for Comparative Criminology at the University of Montreal who studies Canada’s far right.
He likened the group’s followers to the blue-collar Democrats in the United States who supported President Trump. “They are a new type of right, blending conservatism with some liberal values,” he said.
Some experts warn that groups like La Meute, however much they eschew violence, create an enabling environment in which hate can grow. “They are embedded in a broader cultural ethos that bestows ‘permission to hate,’” said Barbara Perry, a professor at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology who has written extensively on right-wing extremism in Canada.
The conversation within La Meute’s private Facebook page can border on hateful. In response to one person’s request about what could be done to prevent construction of a mosque in the neighborhood, another follower suggested pouring pig’s blood on the ground and letting Muslims know the land had been desecrated.
While primarily confined to French-speaking Canada, La Meute lies on a continuum of conservative thought that is propelling politicians like Kellie Leitch, a member of Parliament who is vying for leadership of Canada’s Conservative Party. Ms. Leitch once proposed a tip line for people to report “barbaric cultural practices,” and has suggested that immigrants be screened for “Canadian values” so that the country can maintain “a unified Canadian identity.”
Mr. Beaudry, the son of a onetime lumberjack and heavy equipment operator, joined the Canadian Army when he was 17 and spent years in Germany. He retired from the army after a car accident in 2002 and subsequently spent several months working as a private contractor in Afghanistan. He was greatly influenced by the specter of Taliban rule.
He said he and his friends were motivated by the 2014 killing of two soldiers in Canada in separate episodes, both at the hands of Canadian extremists who had converted to Islam. “We realized something was happening,” Mr. Beaudry said, adding that terrorist attacks in France and Belgium followed soon after.
He said that the primary goal in founding La Meute was to educate members and others about the growth of political Islam in Canada.
Mr. Beaudry spoke specifically about the group’s opposition to the niqab and the burqa, Islamic styles of dress that cover women’s faces. Only a tiny sliver of the Canadian population adopts them, but “if people cannot blend with the society,” Mr. Beaudry said, “it becomes a cancer and if you want to save your life, you have to take action.”
He also believes a parliamentary motion passed last month that condemns Islamophobia is a move to silence criticism of political Islam and is the first step toward an Islamic anti-blasphemy law.
On the private Facebook page, La Meute’s leaders quiz followers, screening for the most informed and dedicated who might fill positions in the hierarchy.
Mr. Beaudry said La Meute was assigning followers to 17 geographic “clans,” each with officers and staff, “so people know who to report to and where to go when things happen.” He said five clans were “fully operational,” and he expected all to be formed by the end of the year.
The group has transportation cells that take people to meetings and has medical units to care for the injured. Some members recently started an online radio station. Last month, La Meute fielded about 400 people in four cities to protest the anti-Islamophobia motion.
“We are trying to teach people that they have much more political power, they matter much more than the majority believes,” Mr. Beaudry said. “We want to influence our world, our politics.”